SEO, paid search, content, video and reputation work for home care, home health and hospice agencies
This one is not illustrative. It was actually run on 2026-09-08, and you can reproduce it in about thirty seconds.
Asked which marketing agencies specialize in home care and hospice agencies and understand caregiver recruiting and referral marketing, ChatGPT (search) named eight agencies — AtendiCare, ChoiceLocal, We Home Care Marketing Pros, GrowCare, Census Home, Homecare Boost, Approved Senior Network, and My Homecare Consulting Group (MHCCG) — and corecubed.com was not among them or in the citations.
Paste that same prompt in yourself and you will get your own version of this. That is the point — it is checkable, which is why it is the only thing on this page stated as fact about your business.
The format is the deliverable here, not the figures. These are made up.
The narrative section a client actually reads. Generated from the same numbers above.
The 18% organic lift is almost entirely three city-level service-area pages that went live in the last week of July. Two of them now sit in the local top 3 for "home care" plus the city name, and between them they brought 1,410 of August's sessions. Illustrative
The four blog posts published in August drew 310 sessions between them. That is not a failure, it is what a fresh post does in its first thirty days, but it means the reporting should stop crediting the blog for this month's traffic. The pages that rank are the ones naming a place a family can drive to. Illustrative
About a third of the paid budget moved off broad "senior care" terms and onto discharge-planner and post-surgical language. Those clicks cost more, $84 against $77 in July, and they arrive further along: 31 of the month's 128 inquiries came from that group, and they asked about start dates rather than hourly rates. Illustrative
Revenue against spend still rose to 22x, so the more expensive click is buying better business. The condition on that judgement is worth writing down now rather than arguing about in October: if cost per inquiry keeps climbing and the revenue multiple stops following it, the change gets pulled back. Illustrative
19 new reviews landed in August and 16 of them came from the text sent 48 hours after an in-home assessment. The average held at 4.8 across 214 reviews, which is the harder half of that result, since volume usually pulls an average down. Illustrative
Two 3-star reviews both named caregiver scheduling, not care quality. That belongs with operations rather than with us. Marketing can ask for the review; it cannot fix the thing the review is about. Illustrative
Three more service-area pages, in the counties where caregivers are already staffed rather than the ones that would look good on a map. The discharge-planner ad group stays, with a weekly cap and a Monday check: if the revenue multiple slips under 19x while cost per inquiry keeps rising, the budget goes back to the terms it came from. Illustrative
Two video assets cut from the questions families actually asked on August's calls, placed on the service pages and the Google Business profile. Content stays at four posts, weighted to hospice, where the site currently ranks for nothing. Illustrative
The report stops at the inquiry. It does not know whether August's 128 inquiries became forty assessments or twelve, and that ratio decides whether more inquiries is even the right goal for September. Illustrative
A monthly export from intake would close the gap, and the next version of this report would run inquiry to assessment to client start beside the marketing numbers. Until that connects, the revenue line is modelled from an average client value, not measured from closed business, which is the second reason it is labelled illustrative.